Delhi High Court Passed An Order Stating Patent Working Information Not Confidential.

The Delhi High Court recently has passed a detailed order stating that patent working information cannot be termed as ā€œconfidentialā€ and that submitting the same by patentees is compulsory.
The order came in a writ petition filed byĀ Prof (Dr.) Shamnad BasheerĀ in 2015 who has alleged non-compliance with the provisions of Patents Act, 1970 on the part the Controller General of Patents. The Petition demands that the authorities be directed to enforce the statutory obligations under the Act.
Appearing for the petitioner, Advocates Abhimanyu Bhandari and Sai Vinod contended thatĀ the grant of patents results in the patentees getting exclusive rights over inventions and therefore, it is imperative that the Controller General maintains a scrutiny as to whether the patent is being worked or not.
It was brought to the notice of the Court that as per the governmentā€™s Annual Report for the year 2012-13, over 30 per cent of the patentees had not submitted the F-27 documents and that no action had been initiated by the Controller General.
Several instances of lapses by companies ā€“ including the likes of NATCO Pharma andĀ Ericsson with regard to filing of patent working documents under Section 146 of the Patents Act, were submitted.
The Bench of Acting Chief Justice Gita Mittal and Justice C Hari Shankar observed that,ā€œAll that the patentees submitting Form-27 are required to submit the details of the licenses and sub-licenses. This information certainly cannot be termed ā€œconfidentialā€ and therefore, the Patents Office has to treat such suppression as failure to comply with the requirements of Section 146 of the Patents Act, 1970 arid to take action against the patentees who do not furnish the required information.ā€
The Court noted that the petition had been pending sinceĀ 2015, and that it does not have any information as to whether there is any change in the status with regard to the filing of returns under Section 146, or whether any action has been taken by the Controller General of Patents and Designs under Section 122.
The Court granted time to Central Government Standing Counsel Amit MahajanĀ to inform the Court about the status of the amendment of the rules and the action taken under Section 122.
The matter will be next heard on January 18.
 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *