- ticket title
- Maharastra Govt.: We are ready to send Sanjay Dutt to jail if it founds that any rule has been scorned.
- Law Mantra invites application for Research Associates; Apply before 15th Aug,2017
- Vande Mataram has been made mandatory to be sung and played in All Educational Institutions
- Pandher and Koli sentenced to death in Nithari case
- Gujrat HC has put provisional stay on criminal proceedings against Shahrukh Khan
Some temporary employees of Punjab government approached the SC after Punjab and Haryana HC held that temporary employees were not entitled to the minimum of the regular pay-scale, merely for the reason that activities carried on by them and the regular employees were similar.
Supreme Court, a bench of Justice J S Khehar and S A Bobde held that the principle of ‘equal pay for equal work’ has to be made applicable to those who are daily wagers, casual and contractual employees, work similarly as regular one employees.
Court said “In our considered view, it is fallacious to determine artificial parameters to deny fruits of labour. An employee engaged for the same work, cannot be paid less than another, who performs the same duties and responsibilities. Certainly not, in a welfare state. Such an action besides being demeaning, strikes at the very foundation of human dignity”. Further, bench said, “Anyone, who is compelled to work at a lesser wage, does not do so voluntarily. He does so to provide food and shelter to his family, at the cost of his self respect and dignity, at the cost of his self worth and at the cost of his integrity”.
“For he knows, that his dependents would suffer immensely, if he does not accept the lesser wage. Any act of paying less wages, as compared to others similarly situated, constitutes an act of exploitative enslavement, emerging out of a domineering position. Undoubtedly, the action is oppressive, suppressive and coercive, as it compels involuntary subjugation,” court said.
Citing Article 7 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, 1966, to which India is a signatory and had ratified it on April 10, 1979, the apex court said, “There is no escape from the above obligation”.
It said in view of different constitutional provisions and the law declared by the Court under Article 141 of the Constitution, the principle of ‘equal pay for equal work’ constitutes “a clear and unambiguous right and is vested in every employee, whether engaged on regular or temporary basis”.
In the meantime court also directed the Punjab government to pay the petitioners the minimum of the pay-scale (at the lowest grade, in the regular pay-scale), extended to the regular employees holding the same post.