LAW MANTRA     (Think Beyond Others)
  • index
    Case Brief: Carlsberg India Pvt. Ltd. v Radico Khaitan Ltd.

    FACTS The plaintiff, Radico Khaitan Ltd., had argued for a proprietary interest in the mark ‘8 PM’. It claimed that the numeral ‘8’ is an essential, distinguishing and identifying feature of its mark in relation to the font size and the colour with which the numeral ‘8’ is printed. The defendant, Carlsberg India Pvt. Ltd.,

    Read more
  • SC
    Case Brief: D. Velusamy v. D. Patchaiammal (2010) 10 SCC 469

    Deciding Authority: Supreme Court of India Name of the Judges: Justice Markandey Katju, Justice T.S. Thakur Date of Judgement: October 21, 2010 Facts of the Case: The appellant alleged that he was married according to the Hindu Customary Rites with one Lakshmi on 25.6.1980. Their male child was born, who was studying in an Engineering

    Read more
  • index
    Case summary : Arun Jaitley v Network Solutions Pvt. Ltd. and Ors.

    FACTS The Plaintiff, Arun Jaitley, wanted to book the domain name “www.arunjaitley.com”. However, after the expiration of the domain name, the Defendants, alleged to have mala fide intentions, did not deleted the said domain but transferred it to Defendant No. 3, Portfolio Brains LLC, which was an auction site for domain names. However, an interim

    Read more